E-1 through E-5Junior enlisted
Civilian general pay adjustment
August 26 presidential pay plan
0%.Please interpret accordingly.
Military personnel receive a financial reason to remain. For civilians, continued attendance appears to have settled the question.
Your disappointment does not require a correction to the pay table.
Read the allocation01 The retention hierarchy
The money found the people it wanted.
Recruiting and retention justify military pay growth under the plan. The general civilian schedule receives zero, suggesting that the difficulty of keeping people depends on which people are leaving.
E-6 through O-3Includes captains
O-4 and aboveSenior officers
General ScheduleCivilian base & locality
January 2027 adjustments in the August 26 presidential pay plan. Military percentages apply to basic pay, subject to statutory caps. Civilian 0% applies to the general base and locality schedules; a separate 3.8% law-enforcement adjustment is directed. Pay plan, pp. 1–2.
Annual basic-pay increase
6% of $92,844
Annual general schedule increase
0% of $147,945
The same pay review produces two rather different invitations to stay.
Fixed profiles, before deductions. Captain increase: $5,570.64 per year, rounded. DFAS 2026 O-3 table · OPM 2026 RUS table · 2027 pay plan. Individual step increases, promotions, awards, and special rates are outside this comparison.
02 The compensation verdict
A captain moves ahead while the GS-15 stays put.
An O-3 over six years exceeds a GS-15 step 1 by $1,427 in the selected 2027 model. The civilian still leads on cash pay. Change the basis below to inspect the distinction. OPM 2026 RUS table, grade 15
2027 selected model
Captain ahead per year on this basis. Projected values under the August 26 pay plan.
Military tax-equivalent value less Social Security; civilian salary less 4.4% FERS and Social Security. This selected model is not take-home pay or a full benefits valuation.
MethodologyProfiles, assumptions, and calculation
O-3 over six years of service, with-dependents housing allowance at Hill AFB, Utah; GS-15 step 1, Rest of U.S. locality. The model uses a 22% federal income-tax gross-up on housing and subsistence allowances. The selected civilian deduction assumes a 4.4% FERS contribution. Both sides deduct 6.2% Social Security on covered pay.
| Annual component | Captain | GS-15 |
|---|---|---|
| Basic pay / gross salary | $98,415 | $147,945 |
| Housing allowance | $28,332 | No separate allowance |
| Subsistence allowance | $3,942 | No separate allowance |
| Modeled tax advantage | $9,103 | $0 |
| Selected FERS deduction | $0 | −$6,510 |
| Selected Social Security deduction | −$6,102 | −$9,173 |
| Comparison value | $133,690 | $132,263 |
2027 applies the pay plan's 6% O-3 basic-pay adjustment and unchanged civilian schedule. Housing and subsistence allowances remain at their 2026 values for this projection. The model excludes Medicare, individual income taxes, health-benefit values, pension accruals, bonuses, special pays, and differences in service obligations. Rounded components may differ by $1 from the rounded total.
Calculation inputs · Military source series · Civilian source series
Fixed profiles: Hill AFB, with dependents; Rest of U.S. locality. These are not equivalent jobs.
Read the full comparisonThe experience question
The problem with experience
Consider a 30-year-old captain and a GS-15 with 30 years of experience. One is described in terms of potential; the other can explain why the last three attempts at the current proposal failed. Only one of these is likely to be welcomed at the briefing.
The captain must contribute more, since the selected compensation model assigns the captain greater value. Requiring a separate measure of contribution would mean doing the assessment twice.
Illustrative editorial scenario. Age and career length are not inputs to the pay calculation above. Its civilian profile is GS-15 step 1, not a modeled 30-year career. Pay is not a measure of productivity.
03 Deferred Resignation Program
The first invitation came with continued pay.
In 2025, OPM offered eligible employees deferred resignation and explicitly encouraged private-sector work. Its FAQ described a move from lower productivity jobs in the public sector
to higher productivity jobs in the private sector
. OPM DRP FAQ.
Employees who stayed continued doing the work, which was an awkward response to an invitation to leave. There is only so much a personnel office can convey in a resignation offer before having to repeat itself through the pay schedule.
They offered to pay you to leave. You appear to have heard “please stay.”

04 Make room for leadership
The appointment was the assessment.
A political appointee arrives with an endorsement from the people making the decision. A career employee arrives with experience, qualifications, and several reasons the decision may not work. It is easy to see which application is more convenient to process.
Institutional knowledge has a habit of introducing information after leadership has finished being informed. A fresh perspective avoids this problem by having no recollection of the previous attempt.
Thirty years of experience is thirty years of attachment to procedures we have not read.
The decision logicThe accountability allocation
Accountability has been delegated.
The national debt requires an explanation, and bad civilian management is a convenient place to begin. Elected leaders approved the policies and appointees supplied the direction, but career staff were still in the building when the bill arrived. The personnel records should make them easy enough to find.
Who makes better decisions? We recommend looking at the results, provided the review preserves leadership’s ownership of the strategy and assigns everything that happened afterward to implementation.
This page does not calculate the causes of federal debt or assess individual performance.

05 An overlooked constituency
Please consider the contractor.
Every dollar paid directly to a government employee is a dollar that missed an opportunity to become contract revenue.
You have a salary. They have growth targets. Before requesting a raise, consider the contractor who could have invoiced for this. The same work becomes easier to respect once it arrives with overhead, a management fee, and a cover letter.
The case for the invoiceCompensation requires restraint. Continued service indicates the restraint is working.
Compensation requires realism. A larger invoice indicates the work was more sophisticated than previously appreciated.
Payroll dollars do not automatically become contract funds. In covered procurements, FAR 52.222-46 requires evaluating professional compensation for realism, recruiting, retention, and continuity. A contract bill rate is not an employee’s salary.
06 The decision framework
Every outcome confirms the strategy.
The strategy can accommodate employees staying, employees leaving, and the cost of replacing them. Please select whichever result occurred; the assessment has already been entered.
| Observed outcome | Approved interpretation | Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Employees stay | Compensation is sufficient. | Confirmed |
| Employees leave | Workforce reduction is succeeding. | Confirmed |
| Expertise disappears | External support is required. | Confirmed |
| Contract costs increase | The work demands specialized expertise. | Confirmed |
| Employees question the result | Resistance to reform remains a concern. | Confirmed |
There is no field for “the policy was wrong.”
Submit your objection to the explanationThe remaining consideration
The work may still be necessary. Your employment is a separate consideration.
Please take the pay decision into account when considering your next contribution.
The record is available