FPPFederal Pay Parity

General Schedule and military grades

Comparing distinct compensation systems.

There is no universal conversion between a GS grade and a military rank. But named profiles can reveal a real workforce signal: the selected GS-15 led O-3 by $23,428 in 2001, led by only $3,799 in 2026 actual data, and trails by $1,427 under the 2027 forecast on the selected taxable-equivalent basis.

ActualForecastAssumptionInterpretation

Last reviewed August 22, 2026

What the numbers show

  • Use explicit profiles, not a generic GS-to-rank conversion chart.
  • Keep geographic assumptions visible: the model uses Rest of U.S. GS pay and Hill AFB BAH.
  • Compare growth indexes when testing parity; compare dollars when testing a point-in-time recruiting or retention question.

Profiles available in the model

The Compensation Gap Explorer lets readers choose which profiles are visible.
Civilian profilesMilitary profilesPrivate benchmark
GS-7 step 1; GS-9 step 1O-1 under 2; O-2 over 2BLS average hourly wage × 2,080
GS-11, GS-12, GS-13, GS-14 step 1O-3 over 6; O-4 over 10Broad wage context, not occupation matching
GS-13 and GS-15 step 10O-5 over 16; O-6 over 22Actual through 2026 Q1 partial; 2027 forecast

A defensible comparison has six inputs

  1. civilian grade and step;
  2. civilian locality area;
  3. civilian contribution basis;
  4. military grade and years of service;
  5. military housing area and dependent status; and
  6. whether nontaxable allowances are shown as cash or taxable-salary equivalent.

Source tables

Current civilian rates come from OPM salary tables. Military basic pay comes from DFAS officer tables, and housing allowances come from the official BAH lookup.

See what the gap means for your comparison.

Use the Compensation Gap Explorer, review the methodology, or download the underlying data and workbook.